John Coleman, co-founder of the Weather Channel, has dismissed the threat of global warming as “not valid”.
After years of study and independently reviewing the same evidence that the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) used, Coleman sent an open letter to the IPCC stating he did not find evidence of the giant threat of global warming.
“I have studied this topic seriously for years. It has become a political and environment agenda item, but the science is not valid,” he concluded. “There has been no warming over 18 years.”
“The ocean is not rising significantly,” Coleman wrote. “The polar ice is increasing, not melting away. Polar Bears are increasing in number. Heat waves have actually diminished, not increased. There is not an uptick in the number or strength of storms (in fact storms are diminishing).”
But the liberal IPCC won’t consider Coleman’s research, arguing that their research does in fact indicate a continuing trend of global warming in the future.
But Coleman is not the only one who thinks that the evidence points contrary to global warming. Climate expert William Happer from Princeton University states:
“The incredible list of supposed horrors that increasing carbon dioxide will bring the world is pure belief disguised as science.”
Further, the InterAcadamy Council claimed they found “little evidence” to support the IPCC’s supposedly “substantive findings” all the way back in 2010.
So if our planet is not in process of reverting back Jurassic conditions, and several researchers have stood up against IPCC to question the global warming evidence, why is IPCC spending all of our tax dollars to first guilt the American and global community and then prattle about a plan for solve global warming? Because big government is big business for a select few.
Nobody has a crystal ball which reveals the future, but the IPCC is hoping to convince you that they do, because the evidence we have to examine about past and current conditions does not support where they are going.
(h/t Conservative Tribune)