Liberals definitely have some wacky ideas, in fact we’re constantly scratching our heads in amazement at the stupidity that people can achieve and still be able to survive without constant supervision. However just when you thought that two brain cells were the very least someone could have and still be able to function, someone comes along and proves it’s possible with just one that’s barely holding on for dear life.
A recent article on Slate.com has proven that what we thought to be medically impossible is not only possible, but it has happened. Christin Scarlett Milloy authored a piece titled “Don’t Let the Doctor Do This to Your Newborn,” and it’s full of some of the craziest liberal psychobabble you’ve ever heard.
What is “this” exactly? Assign them a gender at birth because there’s an extremely slight chance that as they grow older they may disagree with the gender they’ve been assigned.
Milloy starts out with a lengthy explanation of some fantasy medical procedure in which a doctor explains these horrible side effects but attempts to convince parents to do it anyways. Obviously a scare tactic, she makes it sound as if by having a gender assigned to your child they’re going to die young of some horrible disease.
“Would you consent to this treatment for your child?” she asks.
“It’s a strange hypothetical scenario to imagine,” Milloy writes. “Pressure to accept a medical treatment, no tangible proof of its necessity, its only benefits conferred by the fact that everyone else already has it, and coming at a terrible expense to those 1 or 2 percent who have a bad reaction. It seems unlikely that doctors, hospitals, parents, or society in general would tolerate a standard practice like this.”
Just when you think the article couldn’t get any weirder, Milloy writes that “The imaginary treatment I described above is real. Obstetricians, doctors, and midwives commit this procedure on infants every single day, in every single country.
“In reality, this treatment is performed almost universally without even asking for the parents’ consent, making this practice all the more insidious. It’s called infant gender assignment.”
She then explains how when a child is born, they’re told they can be anything or do anything they want to do. “But why in the first place must this person be a boy and that person be a girl?” she asks.
“With infant gender assignment, in a single moment your baby’s life is instantly and brutally reduced from such infinite potentials down to one concrete set of expectations and stereotypes, and any behavioral deviation from that will be severely punished.”
At this point Milloy’s insane ramblings become almost incoherent as she explains all the reasons why we shouldn’t identify children by their natural sex. Her main point is that because a very small percentage of children might end up being transgendered, nobody at all should want their child to be given the harsh label of “boy” or “girl” because it’s like playing “Russian roulette” with your child, oh the humanity.
According to Milloy, “This issue deserves serious consideration by every parent, because no matter what gender identity your child ultimately adopts, infant gender assignment has effects that will last through their whole life.”
“Infant gender assignment is a wilful decision, and as a maturing society we need to judge whether it might be a wrong action.”
So there you have it from the mind of a liberal, again they ask society to conform to their insane ideology to not offend a few. Forget about the fact that medically speaking, gender assignment is necessary in order to administer the right treatments and give a child a name.
Would you ever consider not assigning your child with a gender? Let us know with a comment!