Mike Rowe has never been one to mince words, in fact part of what’s made him famous is his willingness to speak his mind as he sees fit. On Monday he showed us yet again that he’s not going to back down, and fortunately for all of us it was a slime ball attorney on the receiving end.
When the former “Dirty Jobs” TV host visited a local liquor store recently he noticed a picture of a man in a white shirt near the front of the shop. The man was being identified by the store as a shoplifter so they posted his picture as a deterrent.
Rowe recalled the incident on Facebook.
“Good for you,” he told the store’s owner. “I wish every store in the country did this.”
Someone behind Rowe overheard what he had told the shop owner and decided to speak up. They disagreed and said that it wasn’t right for someone who may be innocent to be publicly shamed in such a manner.
Rowe, being headstrong and standing up for what he believes in, continued the conversation by responding to the man who disagreed.
His Facebook post continued:
“If I were falsely accused I would feel angry. But why would the owner put my face in his window and identify me as a shoplifter if he didn’t have proof that I was in fact a shoplifter?
‘Mistakes happen,’ said the guy in line.
I looked at the manager and said, ‘Frank, have you ever made a mistake or falsely accused someone of shoplifting from your store?’
‘Of course not,” said Frank. ‘I have the proof on the video. I put up a new photo every week. I have hundreds of these scumballs on tape.’
‘Really? So has this strategy helped cut down on theft?’
‘Big time,’ said Frank. I used to get ripped off every day. Now it’s more like once a week.’
Then a third guy chimed in. He identified himself as a lawyer, and said that even if Frank had proof of the crime, the guy in the photo could sue him and very likely win. I was incredulous.
‘On what grounds?’ Telling the truth in a storefront window?’
The lawyer shrugged. ‘I could argue that the man in that photo – were he my client – suffered irreparable harm to his reputation and public standing. I’d argue that Frank here was the proximate cause of that damage. Moreover, the level of potential harm caused by this photo goes far beyond the punishment typically handed down for this kind of petty crime.’
‘Are you that good a lawyer,’ I asked? Or does our country really have it’s head that far up it’s own ass?’
For the next ten minutes, we discussed the law, public shaming, petty theft, and the rights of the accused. I expressed my belief that stocks should be brought back to the public square. Frank concurred. The first guy in line called me a ‘modern day Torquemada,’ which I took as a compliment. The lawyer was in favor of stocks, but only because they’d be good for business. The whole thing made me very thirsty for the Whistle Pig, waiting patiently in my brown paper bag.
Finally I asked, ‘What would happen if I posted this photo on my Facebook page? Could the shoplifter then sue me?’
‘Alleged shoplifter,’ said the guy in line.
‘Sure,’ said the lawyer. ‘Anybody can sue anybody for anything.’
‘Yeah, but would you take the case?’
The lawyer looked at me with something I’ll call recognition. ‘If I thought there were a decent chance at a recovery, sure.’
‘So if I post this image on my Facebook page, and the guy in the photo comes to you and says I’ve ruined his reputation by telling the world he’s guilty of shoplifting, you’d sue me? Even if the guy is proven guilty on tape?’
‘Suing celebrities is fun,’ said the lawyer. ‘They usually settle, just to avoid the headache. But just to be clear – I’d sue Frank here as well.’
After careful consideration and deliberation with Frank, I’ve decided to post the photo in his front window. But upon the advice of my own attorney, I’ve concealed the identity of the no-good shoplifting scumbag in the white tee-shirt and jeans. I realize this defeats the purpose, but that’s what things have come to in my world.
Don’t you just love to see it when someone spites a weasel attorney?