Putin Finally Comes Through, Russian Leaks Prove 9/11 An Inside Job
June 18, 2014 10:26am PST
Almost 13 years later, countless Americans are still skeptical regarding the events that transpired on 9/11. As we reported back in May, Putin was rumored to have definitive proof demonstrative that the attacks on that infamous day were perpetrated but U.S. officials and was set to release the documents in order to expose Obama.
It appears that the Russian President has finally come through.
Recently released was a massive Russian data dump that consisted of files detailing Intel discovered regarding the WTC plane attacks. Although many people personally saw planes fly into the Twin Towers, both personally and on TV, it appears as though these documents detail something a bit more sinister.
Now, as Americans, we all know that the story coming from the White House claims that extremist Muslims from a terrorist organization (Al Qaeda) hijacked a series of planes and flew them into a set of strategic locations (WTC’s, Pentagon, and the field in Pennsylvania believed to have been headed for the White House). As these documents have it however, the Twin Towers in NYC were brought down by strategically placed micro-nukes, underneath the building causing its collapse.
According to the documents contained within the data dump, the nukes used were supposedly handed off to Israel back in the 1980’s. Apparently we decided to pocket a few amidst the exchange but did hand over quite a few of them.
Only a 2 kiloton device was needed to drop the buildings. A 2 kiloton device will produce a fireball of apx 150 to 200 feet in diameter at over 4000 degrees Centigrade. Just large enough to melt the I beams of the central core of the building and drop them in place. The light flash would last less than 1 second and primarily be in the UV light range. Overpressure would only be at 60PSI max and directed upwards with the blast. See underground effect.
Fallout would be minimal and located to within ground zero range only. Radiation would drop to acceptable levels within 72 hrs. after the blast. Most fall out was trapped in the cement dust thus causing all of the recent cancer deaths that we are now seeing in NYC amongst first responders. (Editor’s note: Consistent with site data)
Furthermore, Dean details a surprising few more findings he was able to scrounge up hidden deep within the data dump as he continues to write:
The primary purpose of the nuclear weapon used on 911 was to produce a massive Gama ray / neutron flux that would vaporize about 150 to 300 feet of 6 inch thick steal I beams that constituted the central core of the WTC buildings. This created a free fall event as seen on TV that day. (Editor’s note: Critical information here.)
The flash would be hidden from sight due to the underground detonation. Most of the light was in the non-visible light spectrum any way. Over pressure would be reduced to 6 psi due to the blast traveling up the central core and neutron radiation vaporizing the TV antenna at the top of the building as see on TV.
The fallout would be mainly vaporized concrete cement and iron oxide. This is why after 911 they told everyone on TV that the beta radiation burns that people were getting were due to the caustic cement dust and not due to the radiation effects from the radioactive cement fallout. (Editor’s note: Fully confirmed)
The iron oxide found all over the place was what was left of the steel I beams. This was the so called Nano Thermite that was found everywhere. Fallout was limited to a 1 mile area around down town NYC. See charts. (Editor’s note: Received)
Radiation decay was reduced to safe low levels after 72 hrs., (Editor’s note: Fully confirmed) outside of ground zero its self. This is why the area was blocked off from the public for 3 days after the event, in order to let the radiation drop to safe levels.
Given everything America has gone through on account of 9/11, it hardly seems justified to consider an option other than the evil placed before us. But if this were true, and did turn out to be an authentic account of the happenings of that day, don’t the American people deserve to know?
The question stands; is perusing a farfetched conspiracy theory worth taking away from the lives lost that day? It would seem that the only way in which it would is if it proved to be true.
So what do you guys think – could there be any truth to this or is this more conspiracy nonsense? Let us know in the comments below.