We’ve all heard the narrative that Obama would have loved the American people to have believed in saying that the attacks on the consulate in Benghazi came about due to an anti-Muslim video. Although we know this to be untrue, more and more information has come forward suggesting that this was never thought of as the root cause by anyone – not even Obama and his administration.
Yesterday we reported on a story that may have been a far stretched theory – and perhaps even teetered on the brink of conspiracy – in which claims were made suggesting that the creator of the now infamous video was actually a Muslim agent working for Obama’s administration. Although the notion seemed a bit “out there,” but new information that has come forward could even credit the seemingly exaggerated claim.
Apparently, Obama and his administration heard the terrorists that were attacking the consulate speaking on State Department phones at the time. According to retired major in the U.S. Air Force Eric Stahl, “members of a CIA-trained Global Response Staff were confused by repeated references to a video as the driving force behind the attacks, because the administration ‘knew during the attack…who was doing the attacking.’”
Furthermore, Stahl added, “Right after they left the consulate in Benghazi and went to the [CIA] safehouse, they were getting reports that cell phones, consulate cell phones, were being used to make calls to the attackers’ higher ups.”
So the question here is, if Obama knew it was a planned and intentional terrorist attack, rather than a slowly accelerated process, why try and cover it up? It seems that Obama and his goon squad had this anti-Muslim video story planned out from the beginning and had designated it as an excuse in the first place.
This notion only further brings on implications that either Obama had prior knowledge that the attacks were going to happen and did nothing to save the lives of Americans, or was somehow directly involved in the actually planning process and carrying out of the attack. Of course, the latter would be more damaging and serious in nature, but neither would be any less treasonous.
Let us know what you think – if Obama had no prior knowledge of the attacks, how did he have an excuse all planned out? If this wasn’t an excuse, then why did he use it after hearing that the attacks were planned and intentional and even after hearing terrorists contact their “higher-ups” during that night? Let us know your thoughts on this in the comments below.