Throughout the past 13 years many theories have come forward suggesting that the government’s account for the 9/11 attacks may not necessarily be accurate. Perhaps the most damning evidence has recently come forward as an ex-CIA pilot has recently come forward to give a sworn-testimony that there is no way that any planes hit the World Trade Centers.
John Lear was a military and CIA pilot during his 40 year career and has flown over 100 different types of aircraft. According to his experience, he insists that there is no way that a Boeing 767, flown by an inexperienced pilot, could have crashed into the WTC as described by the government.
Taken from the sworn affidavit:
‘No Boeing 767 airliners hit the Twin Towers as fraudulently alleged by the government, media, NIST and its contractors’, he stated in the affidavit.
‘Such crashes did not occur because they are physically impossible as depicted, for the following reasons: in the case of UAL 175 going into the south tower, a real Boeing 767 would have begun ‘telescoping’ when the nose hit the 14 inch steel columns which are 39 inches on center.
‘The vertical and horizontal tail would have instantaneously separated from the aircraft, hit the steel box columns and fallen to the ground.
‘The engines when impacting the steel columns would have maintained their general shape and either fallen to the ground or been recovered in the debris of the collapsed building.
‘No Boeing 767 could attain a speed of 540 mph at 1000 feet above sea level ‘parasite drag doubles with velocity’ and ‘parasite power’ cubes with velocity.
- The fan portion of the engine is not designed to accept the volume of dense air at that altitude and speed.
- The piece of alleged external fuselage containing 3 or 4 window cutouts is inconsistent with an airplane that hit 14 inch steel box columns, placed at over 500 mph. It would have crumpled.
- No significant part of the Boeing 767 or engine could have penetrated the 14 inch steel columns and 37 feet beyond the massive core of the tower without part of it falling to the ground.
‘The debris of the collapse should have contained massive sections of the Boeing 767, including 3 engine cores weighing approximately 9000 pounds apiece which could not have been hidden. Yet there is no evidence of any of these massive structural components from either 767 at the WTC. Such complete disappearance of 767s is impossible.
The sworn testimony, dated January 28, 2014, has now become part of a suit brought on the United States government by Morgan Reynolds. Suggesting that the government is lying, and in league with mountains of other evidence he feels will disprove government claims, Reynolds is attempting to get to the bottom of things.
If an affidavit is not rebutted within a certain amount of time, it legally becomes law. Lear’s word is especially invaluable as his 19 year stint with the CIA, in which he logged over 19,000 hours of flight times, has made him almost flawlessly knowledgeable when it comes to aircraft and pilot ability.
Further shooting down claims set forth by the government he notes:
‘The alleged ‘controlled’ descent into New York on a relatively straight course by a novice pilot in unlikely in the extreme because of the difficulty of controlling heading, descent rate and descent speed within the parameters of ‘controlled’ flight.
‘It takes a highly skilled pilot to interpret the “EFIS” (Electronic Flight Instrument Display) display, with which none of the hijacker pilots would have been familiar or received training on, and use his controls, including the ailerons, rudder, elevators, spoilers and throttles to effect, control and maintain a descent.
(See also: Some Americans “Rethinking” 9/11
As the law states, if the government cannot rebut the affidavit point-by-point and prove their inaccuracies, they will be forced to admit the claims as truth.
What do you guys think – damning evidence or more conspiracy theory? Let us know in a comment below.