If you didn’t already know how close the danger was, gun grabber Michael Bloomberg was already in the running for past Defense Secretary positions. Robert Gates revealed—amongst other spine tingling information—that the anti-gun mayor was in the running as his successor.
Wouldn’t Obama love that? Another morally bankrupt power house ready to act in similar interest to disarm the American people. Luckily though, he didn’t quite make the cut as America’s future could have been significantly different than it is today.
Bloomberg, very similarly to Obama, has a history of abusing his power and bending the law to get what he wants. And as the government is already equipping our military personnel with the strategic know-how to disarm the public, this could have become quite a predicament—possibly even sparked a revolution as I predict the day the government comes for our guns, one will erupt.
As the government quietly continues to prepare itself for a “civil disturbance,” it’s a surprise to learn that Bloomberg didn’t get the job. You see, if he did, Obama would have likely been able to hammer out some form of stricter gun control that perhaps would even begin confiscation.
The gradual approach already looms on our doorstep, but out of “safety” they would begin the confiscation small. After all, a less armed population is easier to control.
During any “civil unrest” Obama’s administration has laid out a specific set of plans to deny access to, “armories, arsenals, hardware, and sporting good stores, pawnshops, and gunsmith establishments or other places where weapons or ammunition are stored.” If it was time for a revolt, they would have to limit access to weapons immediately.
Furthermore, a document that outline Obama’s instructions stated, “To conserve manpower, consideration may be given to evacuating sensitive items, such as weapons from stores and storing them in a central facility.” If this hypothetical civil unrest were to end, what do you think the likelihood of those weapons being returned would be?
Kurt Nimmo explained, “In other words, during martial law or a government declared civil disturbance in reaction to ‘radical or extremist elements,’ guns will be confiscated and held by the military.”
These aren’t just rumors either–Navy SEAL Ben Smith admitted that Obama’s administration is secretly asking military officials if they would be prepared to confiscate American citizen’s firearms. He explained that, “Going back to the beginning of this administration, I’ve had friends within the community talking about how they were brought in and questioned with people from more towards the top side. The questioning… where it was pointing was do you feel comfortable disarming American citizens?”
Michael Bloomberg has already shown his willingness to commit political and constitutional crime when he used tax payer dollars to fund his gun grabbing program, ”Mayors Against Illegal Guns.” It is fair and logical that we be frightened when someone with this nature has the potential to align with a president who openly supports illegal acts to get their way.
What do you guys think—is there reasonable cause for concern when it comes to Michael Bloomberg? Let us know in a comment below!