The History Of Gun Confiscation and Obama’s Eerily Similar Agenda

AUTHOR

February 27, 2014 11:06am PST

There’s no doubt that it would be in the best interest of the government–especially one with the devious intentions of our current administration–to have an unarmed and forcefully complaint population. This defenseless situation is exactly what our forefathers sought to deny from ever happening again.

Back in England–the pre days of the Revolutionary War–there was one notable rule that allowed the monarch complete and utter control. The fact that citizens didn’t have weapons made them easier to control and also easier to kill if they could not be controlled.

(See also: Proof That The Gun Confiscation Agenda Is Progressing, Bloomberg’s Mayors Against Illegal Guns Exposed)

It’s the reason we rebelled once parted from the confines of England’s borders. Further away from the King and his resources, America took to fighting a war that was an option they were more likely–albeit minimally–to succeed upon.

Is this really the first time that gun confiscation has been mandated? No–the practice dates back to the times where swords were the most sophisticated weapon known to man. Several times throughout history rulers have been documented to rule that weapons are to be confiscated from the people and no longer allowed.

Take for instance within the Japanese culture. Dating back to the late 16th century, Japanese Emperors would order his military to go out amongst the people and take their weapons–the frequent occurrences throughout time were later dubbed “Sword Hunts.”

The most well known sword hunt occurred back in 1588 at the hands of Toyotomi Hideyoshi. Taking over several regions of Japan resulted in newly “obtained” citizens under the Hideyoshi’s reign to revolt trying to save the last of their rights. He soon ordered that all peasants be stripped of their swords–after doing so the swords were melted down to create a statue of the Buddha.

(See also: Obama Gearing Up For Complete Gun Confiscation)

In Germany, Hitler was able to do the same thing–although being as charismatic as he was, citizens basically handed over their guns (besides a select few). Brainwashed by the man’s words he was able to disarm the German people to prevent a violent rebellion all under the cover of a legitimate reason. He in fact claimed it was for the good of the children in order to ensure that they could not be hurt–sound familiar?

Just read what Obama’s Chief of Staff, Rahm Emanuel, said–right out of the Hitler playbook he explains, “You never want a serious crisis to go to waste. And what I mean by that is an opportunity to do things you think you could not do before.”

This however didn’t work so well for Obama as many citizens saw right through his transparent attempts to take away guns. Opposing him until he was defeated, Americans luckily won that battle–although it was nearly lost as Obama intentionally played on the emotions that the recent tragedy had inflicted on the nation.

Since that time, Obama has sworn to go about making sure guns are no longer allowed in the hands of American citizens. Even attempting to go above the law of our nation, he is currently seeking to violate the Second Amendment by using the world’s court to do his dirty work–the U.N.

This along with the constant brainwashing of Americans by using the mainstream media has made this situation all the more ridiculous. Those who own guns or support gun rights are constantly being demonized as homicidal maniacs just waiting to go off on a rampage.

(See also: Forceful Gun Confiscation Begins In California)

This of course couldn’t be further from the truth as every day over 40 million guns owners manage to stay calm under the daily stress that life deals out. Along with this, all of these guns–some 270 Million–are yet to mysteriously “just go off” on their own.

Let us know what you think about Obama’s gun grabbing agenda and what you plan to do when his thugs come asking for them.

 

comments

You must login in order to leave a comment.